Recently, however, a group of short-sighted scientists, librarians, government officials, and “New Media” publishers have launched an initiative named “Open Access” (OA) intended to compete with traditional academic publishers. The purported goal of the OA initiative is to make scientific information free by eliminating journal subscription fees and shifting the burden of publishing costs to authors and their institutions. The present website was developed to counter the myths being propagated by OA proponents, most of whom are bloggers of low repute. The members of the PISD grant that OA proponents may have good intentions; however, there is little doubt that the OA initiative is an ill-conceived and fundamentally misguided endeavour. In particular, the PISD Coalition maintains that OA is not in the best interest of science. After undergoing extensive mediation and couples counseling, the PISD Coalition can confidently assert that scientific information does not want to be free. It wants to stay just where it is: safe and warm in the Reed Elsevier vaults, protected by the long arm of intellectual property law, earning massive profits for traditional publishers.

PISD is a loose-knit coalition of biomedical scientists and other practitioners of clear thinking. We provide an independent, unbiased perspective on current controversies surrounding academic publishing. PISD has no affiliation with any commercial academic publisher. We see the truth so clearly because we’re smart, not because we’re bought. And the truth is simple: OA is bad for science.

Proponents of OA like to point out that most empirical studies assessing the impact of OA on scientific dissemination have found a favorable effect of OA over conventional, closed-access models. There’s no question that it sounds convincing when a library scientist claims that papers that are freely available online are cited significantly more often than papers that aren’t—sometimes twice as often! But there are at least two problems with such ‘data’ that OA advocates won’t tell you about.

First, all of the studies on OA have a common problem: they make assumptions. It’s important to realize that assumptions can be wrong. For example, most of the data favoring OA are based on long-term projections. OA advocates might say things like “if self-archiving online continues to increase at the current rate, 95% of scientific articles will be freely downloadable by 2021, increasing total citations by 350%.” Ninety-five and three-hundred-and-fifty may sound like fancy numbers, but the reality is that to achieve the projections OA advocates make, a lot of assumptions about the future have to hold. The problem is that not only do we not know that these assumptions will hold true, we don’t even know what other factors might come into play that OA advocates haven’t thought to include in their models! To paraphrase a famous man, there are known unknowns—things we know that we don’t know—and unknown unknowns—things we don’t know we don’t know. Contrast that with what we do know for sure—namely, that if OA gains substantial support from the scientific community, commercial publishers will lose hundreds of millions of dollars.

Second, many of the studies on OA have been conducted by scientists. It’s hardly surprising that studies conducted by scientists tend to favor positions that scientists incorrectly believe to be in their best interests! To obtain a balanced viewpoint, you would have to have an equal number of studies conducted by impartial groups that have extensively consulted publishers to obtain their side of the story. Unfortunately, there aren’t very many published studies that favor a conventional publishing model over OA. That shouldn’t be surprising either considering who the editors of scientific journals are: they’re scientists! Isn’t it ironic that scientists are conspiring to eliminate the very same publishing industry that stacks the deck in scientists’ favor, and against itself?

Peer reviewing doesn’t cost journals anything—scientists usually referee papers for free. Isn’t that a little unfair?
It is indeed a source of consternation to many in the publishing industry that current publishing conventions provide scientists with the opportunity to referee papers at no cost. Consider all the benefits reviewers accrue: (a) they get to read potentially important manuscripts several months or years before they’re officially published and become popular; (b) they’re afforded an easy opportunity to silence or scoop competitors by stalling their publications; (c) they might learn something, and you know how scientists are always saying you can’t put a price on knowledge! Given all these benefits, it’s pretty clear that peer reviewers are taking advantage of publishers’ goodwill in a way that publishers never intended. Fortunately, the current outdated model will soon give way to a new, auction-based model currently under development at one of the larger publishing companies.

It depends how far into the future you project. In the first couple of weeks, researchers would fret about where to send the papers they’d already planned to submit. Then, they’d spend a couple of weeks rewriting those manuscripts into a format acceptable to the few OA journals already in operation. In the meantime, a number of academics with vision and technical expertise would set about creating new OA journals that use novel and sophisticated publishing platforms the likes of which have never been seen before. Dissemination of scientific information would flourish, productivity would rise, the pursuit of science would once again attain its rightful status as the noblest of all human enterprises. Then, about five years later, civilization would suddenly collapse. Cities would rust, industries would implode, dinosaurs would once again rule the Earth.

Velvet appeared solemnly after the woman’s because he protected Ronan’s body over the rear associated with his mare and after that rode toward the house. Betty stormed away just like he or she contacted. “She’s eliminated the coupons.” Velvet seated looking, nevertheless stunned. They may-care attitude about subway coupon but unsuccessful facing serious difficulty.

Betty had been within the chilly, one on the job her account stylish and an additional on her behalf gun. She appeared about any time prior to carrying out himself and Velvet for the chase. That’s when she noticed subway printable coupons in the open entrance doors from the underlying cellar. Gloria came to the actual dark pit. She frequently see remnants of blood stream and apparent pull marks and feet prints.

Your woman heard the actual whimper again. “I’m goin’ within, Velvet,” Gloria stated quietly. Something had been wrong. Your woman could feeling it and, moreover, smell this. It stank such as wet pet and rotten beef. Velvet seen Betty vanish in to the underlying cellar. He or she dismounted gradually and staggered for the entrance.

Gloria stopped at the conclusion from the steps. She concealed her gun under the woman’s arm and reached right into a sack on her behalf aspect. Out of this your woman came an extended match and drawn printable subway coupons together an expense beam.

“Good Lord ’n’ gravy! Lookit this clutter.” Velvet needed two cautious steps in towards the cellar and arrived a handkerchief through his wallet. This he or she placed more than his mouth area and nose within the odor of the actual dead animals laying in regards to the otherwise vacant root basement.

Velvet and Betty whirled instantly. Ronan kept his cool and turned slowly to find free laptop usa standing on a knoll behind them. “You meanin’ to rob us, mister?” Ronan spoke to the nearest.

The bandit leveled a scattergun at the group and snarled, “Thet’s right, feller. Now hand over yer money and leave those six-guns kissin’ leather.” Ronan took the cigarillo from his mouth and inspected it as if looking for whatever caused it to smell so awful. “You mean, you two are gonna’ rob us three?”

The desperado looked at his compadre and nodded. “Thet’s right. What of it?”

“Don’t seem like good odds to me.” “Huh?” was the second bandit’s witty comeback, waving the Winchester at his hip.

Betty looked over at Ronan, remembering she had gotten free us laptop a week ago. Could he really get both men before they fired? Ronan stuck the cigarillo back in his mouth and cracked his knuckles. “Now put down those guns and scatter like rabbits so I don’t have to spill your dinners into your innards.”

The closest bandit cocked back both hammers of his scattergun defiantly.

Ronan continued unfazed. “Ever seen a man’s stomach burst? All your dumplin’s come pourin’ out in a bloody stew. Nasty.”

The lead desperado turned and looked hesitantly at his partner. Neither would back down in front of the other though, and so their fate was sealed.

“Just give us your money,” said the bandit with the scattergun.